I still read a newspaper, well, most days anyway, and like to assume I am familiar with words and their meanings. I realize there are new vocabulary words used by the younger generation(s) that I am unfamiliar with and I accept that as a shortcoming, with no problem.
But I find there are news reports or articles where the use of even a single word seems to threaten my ability to read smoothy and achieve comprehension
On June 18, such a blockage occurred with the use of the word "harms." I have a longstanding relationship with the word harm in singular form as a noun, and with harms as verb form. So the flow of my morning newspaper routine was disrupted when I read "both teens suffered harms related to their social media use" and "Other children died because of online harms." Why not, I asked myself, just use the word harm; why the added on s.
I suppose, since the article was written by 2 women who are described as Technical Writers, that the use of harms sounds more technical, professional and more likely to be considered newsworthy. OK., I realize (now) that Shakespeare used such word form. Forsooth, let it be.
Apro pro of nothing, I recall an instance when I was in first grade. My father wanted me to pose this math question to Mrs. Flynn, my teacher. If a farmer has twenty sick sheep, and 2 of them die, how many does he now have. And no, the answer is not 24.
AND, the word "before" has been totally replaced by "ahead of." Why is the question.
No comments:
Post a Comment